Radeon R9 A375 vs GeForce 8600M GT SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated885
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureG8x (2007)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameNB8P-GSVenus
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date23 October 2007 (18 years ago)2015 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores64640
Core clock speed475 MHz1015 MHz
Boost clock speedno data925 MHz
Number of transistors598 Million1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Wattno data
Texture fill rateno data40.60
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3, GDDR2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz4.5 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data72 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1012 (11_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5 (5.1)
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.1 (1.2)
Vulkan-1.2.170

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 80 nm 28 nm

R9 A375 has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 186% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8600M GT SLI and Radeon R9 A375. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 8600M GT SLI is a notebook graphics card while Radeon R9 A375 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2 2 votes

Rate GeForce 8600M GT SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon R9 A375 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8600M GT SLI or Radeon R9 A375, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.