Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU vs GeForce 8600M GT SLI

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated595
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data1.75
ArchitectureG8x (2007)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameNB8P-GSVega 10
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date23 October 2007 (18 years ago)26 August 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores643584 ×2
Core clock speed475 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1500 MHz
Number of transistors598 Million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rateno data336.0 ×2
Floating-point processing powerno data10.75 TFLOPS ×2
ROPsno data64 ×2
TMUsno data224 ×2
L1 Cacheno data896 KB
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3, GDDR2HBM2
Maximum RAM amount1 GB16 GB ×2
Memory bus width128 Bit2048 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed700 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data512.0 GB/s ×2
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1012 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.1.125

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 October 2007 26 August 2018
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 80 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 300 Watt

8600M GT SLI has 1400% lower power consumption.

Pro V340 MxGPU, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8600M GT SLI and Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 8600M GT SLI is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT SLI
GeForce 8600M GT SLI
AMD Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU
Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2 2 votes

Rate GeForce 8600M GT SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1 vote

Rate Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8600M GT SLI or Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.