ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT vs GeForce 8600M GT SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1230
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.02
Power efficiencyno data1.15
ArchitectureG8x (2007)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameNB8P-GSRV630
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date23 October 2007 (18 years ago)28 June 2007 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores64120
Core clock speed475 MHz800 MHz
Number of transistors598 Million390 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rateno data6.400
Floating-point processing powerno data0.192 TFLOPS
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data8
L2 Cacheno data64 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3, GDDR2GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB256 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz700 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data22.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1010.0 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGLno data3.3
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 October 2007 28 June 2007
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 80 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 45 Watt

8600M GT SLI has an age advantage of 3 months, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 125% lower power consumption.

ATI HD 2600 XT, on the other hand, has a 23.1% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8600M GT SLI and Radeon HD 2600 XT. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 8600M GT SLI is a notebook graphics card while Radeon HD 2600 XT is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT SLI
GeForce 8600M GT SLI
ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT
Radeon HD 2600 XT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2 2 votes

Rate GeForce 8600M GT SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 99 votes

Rate Radeon HD 2600 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8600M GT SLI or Radeon HD 2600 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.