GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2 vs 8600M GS

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1445not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.81no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameG86G98
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 May 2007 (18 years ago)4 December 2007 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores168
Core clock speed450 MHz567 MHz
Number of transistors210 million210 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate3.6004.536
Floating-point processing power0.0288 TFLOPS0.0224 TFLOPS
ROPs44
TMUs88
L2 Cache32 KB16 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXM-IIPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data170 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2DDR2
Maximum RAM amount512 MB512 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s6.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model4.04.0
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.11.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 May 2007 4 December 2007
Chip lithography 80 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 25 Watt

8600M GS has 25% lower power consumption.

8400 GS Rev. 2, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 months, and a 23.1% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8600M GS and GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 8600M GS is a notebook graphics card while GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GS
GeForce 8600M GS
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2
GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 39 votes

Rate GeForce 8600M GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 9 votes

Rate GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8600M GS or GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.