GeForce GTX 660 Rev. 2 vs 8600 GTS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1307not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.01no data
Power efficiency0.57no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameG84GK104
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date17 April 2007 (18 years ago)13 September 2014 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32960
Core clock speed675 MHz980 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1032 MHz
Number of transistors289 million3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt140 Watt
Texture fill rate10.8082.56
Floating-point processing power0.0928 TFLOPS1.981 TFLOPS
ROPs824
TMUs1680
L1 Cacheno data80 KB
L2 Cache32 KB384 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length198 mm241 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 6-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount256 MB2 GB
Standard memory config per GPU256 MBno data
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz1502 MHz
Memory bandwidth32 GB/s144.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model4.05.1
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA1.13.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 April 2007 13 September 2014
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 80 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 140 Watt

8600 GTS has 133.3% lower power consumption.

GTX 660 Rev. 2, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8600 GTS and GeForce GTX 660 Rev. 2. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GTS
GeForce 8600 GTS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Rev. 2
GeForce GTX 660 Rev. 2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 214 votes

Rate GeForce 8600 GTS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 51 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 660 Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8600 GTS or GeForce GTX 660 Rev. 2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.