Radeon Pro Vega 20 vs GeForce 8600 GTS Mac Edition

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated438
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data9.50
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameG84Vega 12
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date21 September 2007 (18 years ago)14 November 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores321280
Core clock speed675 MHz815 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1283 MHz
Number of transistors289 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology80 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate10.80102.6
Floating-point processing power0.0928 TFLOPS3.284 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs1680
L1 Cacheno data320 KB
L2 Cache32 KB1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3HBM2
Maximum RAM amount512 MB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit1024 Bit
Memory clock speed1008 MHz740 MHz
Memory bandwidth32.26 GB/s189.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVINo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.3
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 September 2007 14 November 2018
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 80 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 100 Watt

8600 GTS Mac Edition has 33.3% lower power consumption.

Pro Vega 20, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8600 GTS Mac Edition and Radeon Pro Vega 20. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 8600 GTS Mac Edition is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Pro Vega 20 is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GTS Mac Edition
GeForce 8600 GTS Mac Edition
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20
Radeon Pro Vega 20

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 1 vote

Rate GeForce 8600 GTS Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 87 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Vega 20 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8600 GTS Mac Edition or Radeon Pro Vega 20, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.