GeForce GT 230 OEM vs 8600 GT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameG84G92B
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date17 April 2007 (17 years ago)27 April 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$159 no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3296
Core clock speed540 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistors289 million754 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)47 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate8.64024.00
Floating-point performance0.07616 gflops0.24 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length170 mmno data
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR2
Maximum RAM amount512 MB1536 MB
Standard memory config per GPU256 MBno data
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth22.4 GB/s24 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model4.04.0
OpenGL2.13.3
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.11.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 April 2007 27 April 2009
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 1536 MB
Chip lithography 80 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 47 Watt 75 Watt

8600 GT has 59.6% lower power consumption.

GT 230 OEM, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 45.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8600 GT and GeForce GT 230 OEM. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT
GeForce 8600 GT
NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 OEM
GeForce GT 230 OEM

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 990 votes

Rate GeForce 8600 GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 6 votes

Rate GeForce GT 230 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.