Radeon R5 340X OEM vs GeForce 8600 GS

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1367not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.35no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code nameG84Oland
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date17 April 2007 (17 years ago)5 May 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16384
Core clock speed540 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1050 MHz
Number of transistors289 million950 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)47 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate4.32021.60
Floating-point processing power0.03808 TFLOPS0.6912 TFLOPS
ROPs88
TMUs824

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Lengthno data145 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2DDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s16 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model4.05.1
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 April 2007 5 May 2015
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 80 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 47 Watt 65 Watt

8600 GS has 38.3% lower power consumption.

R5 340X OEM, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8600 GS and Radeon R5 340X OEM. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GS
GeForce 8600 GS
AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM
Radeon R5 340X OEM

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 32 votes

Rate GeForce 8600 GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 468 votes

Rate Radeon R5 340X OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.