ATI FireGL V7300 vs GeForce 8600 GS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1320not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.70no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)R500 (2005−2007)
GPU code nameG84R520
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date17 April 2007 (19 years ago)1 October 2005 (20 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,599

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16no data
Core clock speed540 MHz594 MHz
Number of transistors289 million321 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)47 Watt97 Watt
Texture fill rate4.3209.504
Floating-point processing power0.03808 TFLOPSno data
ROPs816
TMUs816
L2 Cache32 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data229 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB512 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz648 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s41.47 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model4.03.0
OpenGL3.32.0
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 April 2007 1 October 2005
Chip lithography 80 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 47 Watt 97 Watt

8600 GS has an age advantage of 1 year, a 13% more advanced lithography process, and 106% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8600 GS and FireGL V7300. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 8600 GS is a desktop graphics card while FireGL V7300 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 35 votes

Rate GeForce 8600 GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FireGL V7300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8600 GS or FireGL V7300, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.