Iris Plus Graphics 930 vs GeForce 840M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking848not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.10no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Generation 11.0 (2019−2021)
GPU code nameGM108Ice Lake GT2
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date12 March 2014 (11 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384256
Core clock speed1029 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed1124 MHz1000 MHz
Manufacturing process technology28 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)33 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate17.9816.00
Floating-point processing power0.8632 TFLOPS0.512 TFLOPS
ROPs88
TMUs1616
L1 Cache192 KBno data
L2 Cache1024 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportPCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x1
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1001 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth16.02 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost2.0no data
Optimus+-
GameWorks+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.1.126-
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 33 Watt 15 Watt

Iris Plus Graphics 930 has a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 120% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 840M and Iris Plus Graphics 930. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 840M is a notebook graphics card while Iris Plus Graphics 930 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 840M
GeForce 840M
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 930
Iris Plus Graphics 930

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 1049 votes

Rate GeForce 840M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 2 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics 930 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 840M or Iris Plus Graphics 930, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.