Radeon RX 470D vs GeForce 8400M GT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1410not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.83no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameG86Ellesmere
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date9 May 2007 (17 years ago)21 October 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores161792
Core clock speed450 MHz926 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1206 MHz
Number of transistors210 million5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)14 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate3.600135.1
Floating-point processing power0.0288 TFLOPS4.322 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs8112

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data241 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount512 MB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed600 MHz1650 MHz
Memory bandwidth19.2 GB/s211.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model4.06.4
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 May 2007 21 October 2016
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 80 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 14 Watt 120 Watt

8400M GT has 757.1% lower power consumption.

RX 470D, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8400M GT and Radeon RX 470D. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 8400M GT is a notebook card while Radeon RX 470D is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8400M GT
GeForce 8400M GT
AMD Radeon RX 470D
Radeon RX 470D

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 22 votes

Rate GeForce 8400M GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 123 votes

Rate Radeon RX 470D on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.