Radeon R6 Mobile Graphics vs GeForce 8400M GT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1477not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.88no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameG86Spectre Lite
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date9 May 2007 (18 years ago)17 September 2014 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16384
Core clock speed450 MHz533 MHz
Boost clock speedno data800 MHz
Number of transistors210 million2,410 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)14 Watt17 Watt
Texture fill rate3.60012.79
Floating-point processing power0.0288 TFLOPS0.4093 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs824
L2 Cache32 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16IGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount512 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed600 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth19.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model4.06.0
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 May 2007 17 September 2014
Chip lithography 80 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 14 Watt 17 Watt

8400M GT has 21.4% lower power consumption.

R6 Mobile Graphics, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8400M GT and Radeon R6 Mobile Graphics. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8400M GT
GeForce 8400M GT
AMD Radeon R6 Mobile Graphics
Radeon R6 Mobile Graphics

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 22 votes

Rate GeForce 8400M GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 15 votes

Rate Radeon R6 Mobile Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8400M GT or Radeon R6 Mobile Graphics, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.