HD Graphics 12EU vs GeForce 8400M GT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1486not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.88no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Generation 5.75 (2010)
GPU code nameG86Ironlake
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date9 May 2007 (19 years ago)10 January 2010 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1696
Core clock speed450 MHz533 MHz
Number of transistors210 million177 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm45 nm
Power consumption (TDP)14 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate3.6006.396
Floating-point processing power0.0288 TFLOPS0.1023 TFLOPS
ROPs42
TMUs812
L2 Cache32 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16QPI
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount512 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed600 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth19.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsMotherboard Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)10.1
Shader Model4.04.1
OpenGL3.32.1
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 May 2007 10 January 2010
Chip lithography 80 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 14 Watt 35 Watt

8400M GT has 150% lower power consumption.

HD Graphics 12EU, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 78% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8400M GT and HD Graphics 12EU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 8400M GT is a notebook graphics card while HD Graphics 12EU is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 22 votes

Rate GeForce 8400M GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 20 votes

Rate HD Graphics 12EU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8400M GT or HD Graphics 12EU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.