GeForce2 Go 100 vs GeForce 8400M GT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1486not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.88no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameG86NV11 B2
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date9 May 2007 (19 years ago)6 February 2001 (25 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16no data
Core clock speed450 MHz125 MHz
Number of transistors210 million20 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)14 Watt2 Watt
Texture fill rate3.6000.5
Floating-point processing power0.0288 TFLOPSno data
ROPs42
TMUs84
L2 Cache32 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16AGP 4x

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount512 MB16 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit32 Bit
Memory clock speed600 MHz166 MHz
Memory bandwidth19.2 GB/s1.328 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)7.0
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.31.2
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 May 2007 6 February 2001
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 16 MB
Chip lithography 80 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 14 Watt 2 Watt

8400M GT has an age advantage of 6 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 125% more advanced lithography process.

GeForce2 Go 100, on the other hand, has 600% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8400M GT and GeForce2 Go 100. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 22 votes

Rate GeForce 8400M GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 5 votes

Rate GeForce2 Go 100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8400M GT or GeForce2 Go 100, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.