GeForce 8400 GS PCI vs 8400M GT
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | no data | Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013) |
| GPU code name | G86M | GT218 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 9 May 2007 (17 years ago) | 17 April 2007 (17 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 16 | 16 |
| Core clock speed | 450 MHz | 520 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 210 million | 260 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 80 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 14 Watt | 40 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 3.600 | 4.160 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.0288 gflops | 0.03936 gflops |
| ROPs | 4 | 4 |
| TMUs | 8 | 8 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCI |
| Length | no data | 170 mm |
| Width | no data | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR3 / GDDR2 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 512 MB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 600 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 19.2 GB/s | 8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | no data |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| HDMI | - | + |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 11.1 (10_1) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 4.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Pros & cons summary
| Chip lithography | 80 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 14 Watt | 40 Watt |
8400M GT has 185.7% lower power consumption.
8400 GS PCI, on the other hand, has a 100% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between GeForce 8400M GT and GeForce 8400 GS PCI. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that GeForce 8400M GT is a notebook card while GeForce 8400 GS PCI is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
