Quadro M5000 SE vs GeForce 8400M GS

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1421not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.75no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameG86GM204
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date9 May 2007 (18 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$14.99 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores162048
Core clock speed400 MHz861 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1038 MHz
Number of transistors210 million5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)11 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate3.200132.9
Floating-point processing power0.0256 TFLOPS4.252 TFLOPS
ROPs464
TMUs8128
L2 Cache16 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-IPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount256 MB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz6612 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s211.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 80 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 11 Watt 100 Watt

8400M GS has 809.1% lower power consumption.

M5000 SE, on the other hand, has a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8400M GS and Quadro M5000 SE. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 8400M GS is a notebook graphics card while Quadro M5000 SE is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8400M GS
GeForce 8400M GS
NVIDIA Quadro M5000 SE
Quadro M5000 SE

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 46 votes

Rate GeForce 8400M GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro M5000 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8400M GS or Quadro M5000 SE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.