GeForce FX 5200 PCI vs 8400M GS

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1403not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.83no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code nameG86NV34 B1
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date9 May 2007 (18 years ago)6 March 2003 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$14.99 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16no data
Core clock speed400 MHz250 MHz
Number of transistors210 million45 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)11 Wattno data
Texture fill rate3.2001.000
Floating-point processing power0.0256 TFLOPSno data
ROPs44
TMUs84
L2 Cache16 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-IPCI
Lengthno data152 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2DDR
Maximum RAM amount256 MB256 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz200 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s6.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)9.0a
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.31.5 (2.1)
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 May 2007 6 March 2003
Chip lithography 80 nm 150 nm

8400M GS has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 87.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8400M GS and GeForce FX 5200 PCI. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 8400M GS is a notebook graphics card while GeForce FX 5200 PCI is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8400M GS
GeForce 8400M GS
NVIDIA GeForce FX 5200 PCI
GeForce FX 5200 PCI

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 43 votes

Rate GeForce 8400M GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 7 votes

Rate GeForce FX 5200 PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8400M GS or GeForce FX 5200 PCI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.