ATI 3D Rage LT PRO AGP vs GeForce 8400M GS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1429not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.75no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)no data
GPU code nameG86Rage LT
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date9 May 2007 (18 years ago)1 November 1997 (28 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$14.99 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16no data
Core clock speed400 MHz75 MHz
Number of transistors210 million8 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm350 nm
Power consumption (TDP)11 Wattno data
Texture fill rate3.2000.08
Floating-point processing power0.0256 TFLOPSno data
ROPs41
TMUs81
L2 Cache16 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-IAGP 2x
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2SDR
Maximum RAM amount256 MB8 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz100 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s800 MB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)6.0
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.31.1
OpenCL1.1None
VulkanN/A-
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 May 2007 1 November 1997
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 8 MB
Chip lithography 80 nm 350 nm

8400M GS has an age advantage of 9 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 338% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8400M GS and 3D Rage LT PRO AGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 8400M GS is a notebook graphics card while 3D Rage LT PRO AGP is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 46 votes

Rate GeForce 8400M GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate 3D Rage LT PRO AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8400M GS or 3D Rage LT PRO AGP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.