GeForce 9400M GeForceBoost vs 8400

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1462not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.59no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)no data
GPU code nameG98no data
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date4 December 2007 (18 years ago)3 June 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$69.78 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores824
Core clock speed540 MHzno data
Number of transistors210 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology65 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Wattno data
Texture fill rate4.320no data
Floating-point processing power0.0208 TFLOPSno data
ROPs4no data
TMUs8no data
L2 Cache16 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16no data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2no data
Maximum RAM amount256 MBno data
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth8 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Videono data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)10
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.3no data
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 December 2007 3 June 2008

9400M GeForceBoost has an age advantage of 5 months.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8400 and GeForce 9400M GeForceBoost. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 8400 is a desktop graphics card while GeForce 9400M GeForceBoost is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 27 votes

Rate GeForce 8400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 15 votes

Rate GeForce 9400M GeForceBoost on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8400 or GeForce 9400M GeForceBoost, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.