GRID RTX T10-8 vs GeForce 8400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1438not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.58no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameG98TU102
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date4 December 2007 (17 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$69.78 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores83584
Core clock speed540 MHz1065 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1395 MHz
Number of transistors210 million18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate4.320312.5
Floating-point processing power0.0208 TFLOPS9.999 TFLOPS
ROPs464
TMUs8224
Tensor Coresno data448
Ray Tracing Coresno data56

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth8 GB/s672.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.8
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA1.17.5
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 150 Watt

GeForce 8400 has 500% lower power consumption.

GRID RTX T10-8, on the other hand, has a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 441.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8400 and GRID RTX T10-8. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 8400 is a desktop graphics card while GRID RTX T10-8 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8400
GeForce 8400
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10-8
GRID RTX T10-8

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 27 votes

Rate GeForce 8400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 40 votes

Rate GRID RTX T10-8 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8400 or GRID RTX T10-8, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.