UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs vs GeForce 8400 SE

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
8400 GS 8400 GS PCI 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2 8400 GS Rev. 2 8400 GS Rev. 3 8400 SE
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G1 Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4 Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) Xe 750 32EUs Xe G1 Xe G4 48EUs

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 8400 SE with UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs, including specs and performance data.

8400 SE
2008
128 MB DDR2, 50 Watt
0.16

Graphics 750 32EUs outperforms 8400 SE by a whopping 2344% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
8400 SE 8400 SE
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1475744
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.25no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Gen. 12 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameG86STiger Lake Xe
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 August 2008 (17 years ago)30 March 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1632
Core clock speed459 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1450 MHz
Number of transistors210 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology80 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Wattno data
Texture fill rate3.672no data
Floating-point processing power0.02938 TFLOPSno data
ROPs4no data
TMUs8no data
L2 Cache16 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16no data
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2no data
Maximum RAM amount128 MBno data
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed400 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Videono data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)DirectX 12_1
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.3no data
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-
CUDA1.1-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD0−116

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 18
+0%
18
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 14
+0%
14
+0%
Fortnite 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 16
+0%
16
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Dota 2 34
+0%
34
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 13
+0%
13
+0%
Fortnite 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 13
+0%
13
+0%
Metro Exodus 6
+0%
6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 15
+0%
15
+0%
Dota 2 31
+0%
31
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 12
+0%
12
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 44 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.16 3.91
Recency 1 August 2008 30 March 2021
Chip lithography 80 nm 14 nm

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs has a 2343.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8400 SE in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 8400 SE is a desktop graphics card while UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce 8400 SE
GeForce 8400 SE
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

8400 SE GeForce 8400 SE
vs
ATI X600 PRO Radeon X600 PRO
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs
vs
R7 M380 Radeon R7 M380
8400 SE GeForce 8400 SE
vs
ATI X800 PRO Radeon X800 PRO
8400 GS PCI Rev. 2 GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2
vs
RTX 4070 Ti RTX 4070 Ti
8400 GS PCI Rev. 2 GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2
vs
RTX 5070 Ti SUPER RTX 5070 Ti SUPER
RTX 3050 Ti Mobile GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile
vs
Instinct MI250X Instinct MI250X
RTX 3050 Ti Mobile GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile
vs
Arc 3 A350M 3 A350M
RTX 3050 Ti Mobile GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile
vs
RTX A5000-12Q RTX A5000-12Q
8400 SE GeForce 8400 SE
vs
RX 6400 RX 6400
8400 SE GeForce 8400 SE
vs
RX 6750 GRE RX 6750 GRE
CMP 30HX CMP 30HX
vs
RTX 3080 12 GB RTX 3080 12 GB
CMP 40HX CMP 40HX
vs
RX 6850 XT RX 6850 XT
CMP 40HX CMP 40HX
vs
RTX A2000 Embedded RTX A2000 Embedded

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.3 8 votes

Rate GeForce 8400 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 15 votes

Rate UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8400 SE or UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.