Radeon Instinct MI350X vs GeForce 8400 SE

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1472not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.24no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)CDNA 4.0 (2025)
GPU code nameG86SCDNA Next
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 August 2008 (17 years ago)2025 (recently)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1616384
Core clock speed459 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2200 MHz
Number of transistors210 million185,000 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt1000 Watt
Texture fill rate3.6722,252.8
Floating-point processing power0.02938 TFLOPS72.09 TFLOPS
ROPs4no data
TMUs81024
Tensor Coresno data1024
L1 Cacheno data4 MB
L2 Cache16 KB16 MB
L3 Cacheno data256 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotOAM Module
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2HBM3e
Maximum RAM amount128 MB288 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit8192 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s8.19 TB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)N/A
Shader Model4.0N/A
OpenGL3.3N/A
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.1-
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 288 GB
Chip lithography 80 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 1000 Watt

8400 SE has 1900% lower power consumption.

Instinct MI350X, on the other hand, has a 230300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2566.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8400 SE and Radeon Instinct MI350X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 8400 SE is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Instinct MI350X is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8400 SE
GeForce 8400 SE
AMD Radeon Instinct MI350X
Radeon Instinct MI350X

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 8 votes

Rate GeForce 8400 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 29 votes

Rate Radeon Instinct MI350X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8400 SE or Radeon Instinct MI350X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.