Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3150 vs GeForce 8400 GS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Gen. 4 (2007−2010)
GPU code nameG86Pineview
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date17 April 2007 (17 years ago)10 January 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$29.99 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores162
Core clock speed459 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data200 MHz
Number of transistors210 million123 Million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm45 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Wattno data
Texture fill rate3.672no data
Floating-point processing power0.02938 TFLOPSno data
ROPs4no data
TMUs8no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16no data
Length170 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2no data
Maximum RAM amount256 MBno data
Standard memory config per GPU256 MBno data
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed400 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Videono data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)no data
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL2.1no data
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 April 2007 10 January 2010
Chip lithography 80 nm 45 nm

Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3150 has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 77.8% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8400 GS and Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3150. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 8400 GS is a desktop card while Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3150 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS
GeForce 8400 GS
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3150
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3150

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 613 votes

Rate GeForce 8400 GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 343 votes

Rate Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.