Stream Processor vs GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Ultra-Threaded SE (2005−2007)
GPU code nameGT218R580
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date12 July 2010 (15 years ago)2006 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16no data
Core clock speed520 MHz594 MHz
Number of transistors260 million384 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt165 Watt
Texture fill rate4.1609.504
Floating-point processing power0.03936 TFLOPSno data
ROPs416
TMUs816
L2 Cache32 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length170 mm241 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB1 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz1296 MBps
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s41.47 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model4.13.0
OpenGL3.32.1 (full) 3.0 (partial)
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.2-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 1 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 165 Watt

8400 GS Rev. 3 has a 125% more advanced lithography process, and 560% lower power consumption.

Stream Processor, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 and Stream Processor. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3
GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3
AMD Stream Processor
Stream Processor

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 133 votes

Rate GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 6 votes

Rate Stream Processor on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 or Stream Processor, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.