ATI FirePro V7800 vs GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameGT218Cypress
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date12 July 2010 (15 years ago)26 April 2010 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$759

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores161440
Core clock speed520 MHz700 MHz
Number of transistors260 million2,154 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate4.16050.40
Floating-point processing power0.03936 TFLOPS2.016 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs872
L1 Cacheno data144 KB
L2 Cache32 KB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length170 mm254 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount512 MB2 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s128.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model4.15.0
OpenGL3.34.4
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.2-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 July 2010 26 April 2010
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 2 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 150 Watt

8400 GS Rev. 3 has an age advantage of 2 months, and 500% lower power consumption.

ATI V7800, on the other hand, has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 and FirePro V7800. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 is a desktop graphics card while FirePro V7800 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3
GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3
ATI FirePro V7800
FirePro V7800

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 159 votes

Rate GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 6 votes

Rate FirePro V7800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 or FirePro V7800, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.