ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View vs GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameGT218RV620
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date12 July 2010 (15 years ago)2009 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1640
Core clock speed520 MHz400 MHz
Number of transistors260 million181 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt32 Watt
Texture fill rate4.1601.600
Floating-point processing power0.03936 TFLOPSno data
ROPs44
TMUs84
L2 Cache32 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length170 mm170 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2DDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB256 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz800 MBps
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s6.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video2x VHDCI

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model4.14.1
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.2-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 256 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 32 Watt

8400 GS Rev. 3 has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 38% more advanced lithography process, and 28% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 and FirePro 2450 Multi-View. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 is a desktop graphics card while FirePro 2450 Multi-View is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 160 votes

Rate GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FirePro 2450 Multi-View on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 or FirePro 2450 Multi-View, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.