GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q vs 8400 GS Rev. 2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated372
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data37.91
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameG98TU117
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date4 December 2007 (17 years ago)23 April 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores81024
Core clock speed567 MHz930 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1125 MHz
Number of transistors210 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt30 Watt
Texture fill rate4.53672.00
Floating-point processing power0.0224 TFLOPS2.304 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs864

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length170 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount512 MB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz1751 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s112.1 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.5
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2.140
CUDA1.17.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 December 2007 23 April 2019
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 30 Watt

8400 GS Rev. 2 has 20% lower power consumption.

GTX 1650 Max-Q, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 441.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2 and GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2 is a desktop graphics card while GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2
GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 7 votes

Rate GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 698 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2 or GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.