ATI FireGL V3200 vs GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Rage 9 (2003−2006)
GPU code nameG98RV380
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date4 December 2007 (18 years ago)1 September 2004 (21 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8no data
Core clock speed567 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistors210 million75 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt46 Watt
Texture fill rate4.5362.000
Floating-point processing power0.0224 TFLOPSno data
ROPs44
TMUs84
L2 Cache16 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length170 mmno data
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2DDR
Maximum RAM amount512 MB128 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz350 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s11.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)9.0b
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.32.0
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 December 2007 1 September 2004
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 128 MB
Chip lithography 65 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 46 Watt

8400 GS Rev. 2 has an age advantage of 3 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 84% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2 and FireGL V3200. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2 is a desktop graphics card while FireGL V3200 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 11 votes

Rate GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FireGL V3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2 or FireGL V3200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.