Radeon Instinct MI250 vs GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)CDNA 2.0 (2021)
GPU code nameGT218Aldebaran
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date17 April 2007 (18 years ago)8 November 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1613312
Core clock speed520 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1700 MHz
Number of transistors260 million58,200 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt500 Watt
Texture fill rate4.1601,414
Floating-point processing power0.03936 TFLOPS45.26 TFLOPS
ROPs4no data
TMUs8832
L1 Cacheno data3.3 MB
L2 Cache32 KB16 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3HBM2e
Maximum RAM amount512 MB128 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit8192 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz1600 MHz
Memory bandwidth8 GB/s3,277 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGANo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)N/A
Shader Model4.1N/A
OpenGL3.3N/A
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.2-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 April 2007 8 November 2021
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 128 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 500 Watt

8400 GS PCI Rev. 2 has 1150% lower power consumption.

Instinct MI250, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 14 years, a 25500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 566.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2 and Radeon Instinct MI250. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Instinct MI250 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 14 votes

Rate GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 22 votes

Rate Radeon Instinct MI250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2 or Radeon Instinct MI250, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.