Tesla K20X vs GeForce 8300

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1432not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.46no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameC78GK110
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date6 May 2008 (17 years ago)12 November 2012 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$7,699

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores162688
Core clock speed500 MHz732 MHz
Number of transistors210 million7,080 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt235 Watt
Texture fill rate4.000164.0
Floating-point processing power0.048 TFLOPS3.935 TFLOPS
ROPs448
TMUs8224
L1 Cacheno data224 KB
L2 Cacheno data1536 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared6 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared384 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1300 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data249.6 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model4.05.1
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA-3.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 May 2008 12 November 2012
Chip lithography 80 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 235 Watt

GeForce 8300 has 488% lower power consumption.

Tesla K20X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 186% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8300 and Tesla K20X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 8300 is a desktop graphics card while Tesla K20X is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 13 votes

Rate GeForce 8300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 54 votes

Rate Tesla K20X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8300 or Tesla K20X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.