Quadro4 700 XGL vs GeForce 8300

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1432not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.46no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Kelvin (2001−2003)
GPU code nameC78NV25 A2
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date6 May 2008 (17 years ago)19 February 2002 (24 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16no data
Core clock speed500 MHz275 MHz
Number of transistors210 million63 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Wattno data
Texture fill rate4.0002.200
Floating-point processing power0.048 TFLOPSno data
ROPs48
TMUs88

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIAGP 4x
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared64 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared225 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data7.2 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)8.1
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.31.3
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 May 2008 19 February 2002
Chip lithography 80 nm 150 nm

GeForce 8300 has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 88% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8300 and Quadro4 700 XGL. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 8300 is a desktop graphics card while Quadro4 700 XGL is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 13 votes

Rate GeForce 8300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro4 700 XGL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8300 or Quadro4 700 XGL, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.