GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB Max-Q vs 8300

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1421not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.46no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameC78GP107
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date6 May 2008 (17 years ago)1 February 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16768
Core clock speed500 MHz1366 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1442 MHz
Number of transistors210 million3,300 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate4.00069.22
Floating-point processing power0.048 TFLOPS2.215 TFLOPS
ROPs424
TMUs848
L1 Cacheno data288 KB
L2 Cacheno data768 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIPCIe 3.0 x16
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared3 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared96 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1752 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data84.1 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.4
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA-6.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 May 2008 1 February 2019
Chip lithography 80 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 75 Watt

GeForce 8300 has 87.5% lower power consumption.

GTX 1050 3 GB Max-Q, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8300 and GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB Max-Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 8300 is a desktop graphics card while GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB Max-Q is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8300
GeForce 8300
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB Max-Q
GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB Max-Q

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 13 votes

Rate GeForce 8300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 24 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8300 or GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB Max-Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.