GMA 3650 vs GeForce 8300

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1432not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.46no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)PowerVR SGX545 (2008−2010)
GPU code nameC78Cedarview
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date6 May 2008 (18 years ago)1 October 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1632
Core clock speed500 MHz640 MHz
Number of transistors210 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology80 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt13 Watt
Texture fill rate4.0002.560
Floating-point processing power0.048 TFLOPS0.04096 TFLOPS
ROPs41
TMUs84

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIPCI
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)10.1
Shader Model4.04.1
OpenGL3.3ES 2.0
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 May 2008 1 October 2008
Chip lithography 80 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 13 Watt

GMA 3650 has an age advantage of 4 months, a 23% more advanced lithography process, and 208% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8300 and GMA 3650. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 8300 is a desktop graphics card while GMA 3650 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 13 votes

Rate GeForce 8300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 5 votes

Rate GMA 3650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8300 or GMA 3650, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.