Tesla K80m vs GeForce 8300 GS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1409not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.52no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015)
GPU code nameG86GK210
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date17 April 2007 (18 years ago)17 November 2014 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores82x 2496
Core clock speed459 MHz562 MHz
Boost clock speedno data824 MHz
Number of transistors210 million7,100 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate3.6722x 182.2 billion/sec
Floating-point processing power0.01469 TFLOPSno data
ROPs42x 48
TMUs82x 208
L2 Cache16 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount128 MB2x 12 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit2x 384 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s2x 240.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12.0 (11_1)
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 April 2007 17 November 2014
Chip lithography 80 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 300 Watt

8300 GS has 650% lower power consumption.

Tesla K80m, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8300 GS and Tesla K80m. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 8300 GS is a desktop graphics card while Tesla K80m is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.9 38 votes

Rate GeForce 8300 GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 13 votes

Rate Tesla K80m on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8300 GS or Tesla K80m, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.