Tegra X1 GPU vs GeForce 8300 GS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1397not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.53no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameG86GM20B
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date17 April 2007 (18 years ago)4 January 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8256
Core clock speed459 MHz1000 MHz
Number of transistors210 million2,000 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm20 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate3.67216.00
Floating-point processing power0.01469 TFLOPS0.512 TFLOPS
ROPs416
TMUs816
L1 Cacheno data96 KB
L2 Cache16 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16IGP
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2System Shared
Maximum RAM amount128 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed400 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.4
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.1
CUDA1.15.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 April 2007 4 January 2015
Chip lithography 80 nm 20 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 15 Watt

Tegra X1 GPU has an age advantage of 7 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 166.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8300 GS and Tegra X1 GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 8300 GS is a desktop graphics card while Tegra X1 GPU is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8300 GS
GeForce 8300 GS
NVIDIA Tegra X1 GPU
Tegra X1 GPU

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.9 38 votes

Rate GeForce 8300 GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 30 votes

Rate Tegra X1 GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8300 GS or Tegra X1 GPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.