GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 2 vs 8300 GS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1379not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.51no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameG86G96C
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date17 April 2007 (18 years ago)27 August 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores816
Core clock speed459 MHz550 MHz
Number of transistors210 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate3.6724.400
Floating-point processing power0.01469 TFLOPS0.0448 TFLOPS
ROPs44
TMUs88

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount128 MB512 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s12.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model4.04.0
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.11.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 April 2007 27 August 2008
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 512 MB
Chip lithography 80 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 50 Watt

8300 GS has 25% lower power consumption.

9400 GT Rev. 2, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 45.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8300 GS and GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 2. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8300 GS
GeForce 8300 GS
NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 2
GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.9 38 votes

Rate GeForce 8300 GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 10 votes

Rate GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8300 GS or GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.