AMD Radeon HD 6650M vs NVIDIA GeForce 825M

Buy
VS
Buy
Price now 160$
Games supported 58%
NVIDIA GeForce 825M
NVIDIA GeForce 825M
Buy
  • Interface PCIe 3.0 x8
  • Core clock speed 850
  • Max video memory 2048 MB
  • Memory type DDR3
  • Memory clock speed 1800
  • Maximum resolution
AMD Radeon HD 6650M
Radeon HD 6650M
Buy
  • Interface PCIe 2.0 x16
  • Core clock speed 600
  • Max video memory 1024 MB
  • Memory type DDR3
  • Memory clock speed 900
  • Maximum resolution
Price now 53$
Games supported 58%

General info

Comparison of graphics card architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters.

Place in performance rating767778
Value for money0.210.36
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Terascale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameGK208Whistler-PRO
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date27 January 2014
(9 years old)
4 January 2011
(12 years old)
Current price$160 $53
Value for money

To calculate the index we compare the characteristics of graphics cards against their prices.

  • 0
  • 50
  • 100
  • 0
  • 50
  • 100

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384480
Core clock speed850 MHz600 MHz
Boost clock speed941 MHzno data
Number of transistors915 million716 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Thermal design power (TDP)33 Wattno data
Texture fill rate30.1114.40
Floating-point performance722.7 gflops576.0 gflops

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Information on GeForce 825M and Radeon HD 6650M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedmedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

Memory

Parameters of memory installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB1 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1800 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s25.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+no data

API support

APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA+no data

Benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.


Overall score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce 825M 1.99
+3.1%
HD 6650M 1.93
  • Passmark
  • 3DMark Vantage Performance
  • 3DMark 11 Performance GPU

Passmark

This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GeForce 825M 783
+3%
HD 6650M 760

GeForce 825M outperforms Radeon HD 6650M by 3% in Passmark.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 16%

GeForce 825M 6000
+48.1%
HD 6650M 4051

GeForce 825M outperforms Radeon HD 6650M by 48% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 16%

GeForce 825M 1757
+69.4%
HD 6650M 1037

GeForce 825M outperforms Radeon HD 6650M by 69% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900pno data19
Full HD33
+83.3%
18
−83.3%

Popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Battlefield 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 no data
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Battlefield 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 no data
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Battlefield 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 no data
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Hitman 3 1−2 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Hitman 3 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance rating 1.99 1.93
Recency 27 January 2014 4 January 2011
Memory bus width 64 128
Pipelines / CUDA cores 384 480
Memory bandwidth 14.4 25.6
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm

Technical City couldn't decide between

NVIDIA GeForce 825M
GeForce 825M

and

AMD Radeon HD 6650M
Radeon HD 6650M

The differences in performance seem too small.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Competitors of GeForce 825M by AMD

The nearest GeForce 825M's AMD equivalent is Radeon 520, which is faster by 1% and higher by 2 positions in our performance rating.

AMD Radeon 520 Radeon 520
Compare

Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce 825M:

Competitors of Radeon HD 6650M by NVIDIA

The nearest Radeon HD 6650M's NVIDIA equivalent is GeForce 825M, which is faster by 3% and higher by 11 positions in our performance rating.

NVIDIA GeForce 825M GeForce 825M
Compare

Here are some closest NVIDIA rivals to Radeon HD 6650M:

GeForce 825M 103.11
Radeon HD 6650M 100
GeForce 920M 95.85

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User rating

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 3 ratings

Rate NVIDIA GeForce 825M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 37 ratings

Rate AMD Radeon HD 6650M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.