Radeon Instinct MI250 vs GeForce 820A

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking992not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.65no data
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)CDNA 2.0 (2021)
GPU code nameGF117Aldebaran
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date17 March 2014 (10 years ago)8 November 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores9613312
Core clock speed775 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1700 MHz
Number of transistors585 million58,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt500 Watt
Texture fill rate12.401,414
Floating-point processing power0.2976 TFLOPS45.26 TFLOPS
ROPs8no data
TMUs16832

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3HBM2e
Maximum RAM amount1 GB128 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit8192 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1600 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s3,277 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)N/A
Shader Model5.1N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 March 2014 8 November 2021
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 128 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 500 Watt

GeForce 820A has 3233.3% lower power consumption.

Instinct MI250, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 820A and Radeon Instinct MI250. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 820A is a notebook card while Radeon Instinct MI250 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 820A
GeForce 820A
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250
Radeon Instinct MI250

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 42 votes

Rate GeForce 820A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 18 votes

Rate Radeon Instinct MI250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.