Tesla K40t vs GeForce 8200M G

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1418not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Architectureno dataKepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameMCP77MV MCP79MVLGK110B
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date3 June 2008 (16 years ago)22 November 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$7,699

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores82880
Core clock speed400 MHz745 MHz
Boost clock speedno data876 MHz
Number of transistorsno data7,080 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data245 Watt
Texture fill rateno data210.2
Floating-point processing powerno data5.046 TFLOPS
ROPsno data48
TMUsno data240

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data12 GB
Memory bus widthno data384 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1502 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data288.4 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1012 (11_1)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.1.126
CUDA-3.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 June 2008 22 November 2013
Chip lithography 80 nm 28 nm

Tesla K40t has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8200M G and Tesla K40t. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 8200M G is a notebook card while Tesla K40t is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8200M G
GeForce 8200M G
NVIDIA Tesla K40t
Tesla K40t

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 35 votes

Rate GeForce 8200M G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Tesla K40t on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.