Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU vs GeForce 8200M G

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1480not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Architectureno dataGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameMCP77MV MCP79MVLVega 10
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date3 June 2008 (17 years ago)29 June 2017 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores83584 ×2
Core clock speed400 MHz852 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1000 MHz
Number of transistorsno data12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data230 Watt
Texture fill rateno data224.0 ×2
Floating-point processing powerno data7.168 TFLOPS ×2
ROPsno data64 ×2
TMUsno data224 ×2
L1 Cacheno data896 KB
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataHBM2
Maximum RAM amountno data16 GB ×2
Memory bus widthno data2048 Bit ×2
Memory clock speedno data945 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data483.8 GB/s ×2
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1012 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.1.125

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 June 2008 29 June 2017
Chip lithography 80 nm 14 nm

Pro V320 MxGPU has an age advantage of 9 years, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8200M G and Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 8200M G is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8200M G
GeForce 8200M G
AMD Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU
Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 39 votes

Rate GeForce 8200M G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1 vote

Rate Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8200M G or Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.