ATI Radeon HD 4670 X2 vs GeForce 8200M G

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1465not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Architectureno dataTeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameMCP77MV MCP79MVLRV730
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date3 June 2008 (17 years ago)10 September 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8320 ×2
Core clock speed400 MHz750 MHz
Number of transistorsno data514 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data118 Watt
Texture fill rateno data24.00 ×2
Floating-point processing powerno data0.48 TFLOPS ×2
ROPsno data8 ×2
TMUsno data32 ×2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountno data512 MB ×2
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit ×2
Memory clock speedno data700 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data22.4 GB/s ×2
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data4x DVI

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1010.1 (10_1)
Shader Modelno data4.1
OpenGLno data3.3
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 June 2008 10 September 2008
Chip lithography 80 nm 55 nm

ATI HD 4670 X2 has an age advantage of 3 months, and a 45.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8200M G and Radeon HD 4670 X2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 8200M G is a notebook graphics card while Radeon HD 4670 X2 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8200M G
GeForce 8200M G
ATI Radeon HD 4670 X2
Radeon HD 4670 X2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 38 votes

Rate GeForce 8200M G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 4 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4670 X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8200M G or Radeon HD 4670 X2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.