T500 Max-Q vs GeForce 8200M G mGPU

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameC79TU117
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date3 June 2008 (17 years ago)2 December 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16896
Core clock speed400 MHz795 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1425 MHz
Number of transistors314 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt18 Watt
Texture fill rate3.20079.80
Floating-point processing power0.0256 TFLOPS2.554 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs856
L1 Cacheno data896 KB
L2 Cacheno data1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data80 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.7 (6.4)
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-7.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 June 2008 2 December 2020
Chip lithography 65 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 18 Watt

8200M G mGPU has 50% lower power consumption.

T500 Max-Q, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 12 years, and a 441.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8200M G mGPU Intel and T500 Max-Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 8200M G mGPU Intel is a notebook graphics card while T500 Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8200M G mGPU Intel
GeForce 8200M G mGPU Intel
NVIDIA T500 Max-Q
T500 Max-Q

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 22 votes

Rate GeForce 8200M G mGPU Intel on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 17 votes

Rate T500 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8200M G mGPU Intel or T500 Max-Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.