Radeon RX 6700M vs GeForce 8200M G mGPU

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated176
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data18.24
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameC79Navi 22
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date3 June 2008 (17 years ago)31 May 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores162304
Core clock speed400 MHz1489 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2400 MHz
Number of transistors314 million17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt135 Watt
Texture fill rate3.200345.6
Floating-point processing power0.0256 TFLOPS11.06 TFLOPS
ROPs464
TMUs8144
Ray Tracing Coresno data36

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared10 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared160 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data320.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.5
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A2.1
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 June 2008 31 May 2021
Chip lithography 65 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 135 Watt

8200M G mGPU has 1025% lower power consumption.

RX 6700M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 12 years, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8200M G mGPU Intel and Radeon RX 6700M. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8200M G mGPU Intel
GeForce 8200M G mGPU Intel
AMD Radeon RX 6700M
Radeon RX 6700M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 3 votes

Rate GeForce 8200M G mGPU Intel on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 131 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6700M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8200M G mGPU Intel or Radeon RX 6700M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.