RTX A3000 Mobile vs GeForce 8200M G mGPU

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated168
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data32.12
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameC79GA104
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date3 June 2008 (16 years ago)12 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores164096
Core clock speed400 MHz600 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1230 MHz
Number of transistors314 million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate3.200157.4
Floating-point processing power0.0256 TFLOPS10.08 TFLOPS
ROPs464
TMUs8128
Tensor Coresno data128
Ray Tracing Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared6 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared192 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1375 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data264.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.7
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.6

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 June 2008 12 April 2021
Chip lithography 65 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 70 Watt

8200M G mGPU has 483.3% lower power consumption.

RTX A3000 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 12 years, and a 712.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8200M G mGPU Intel and RTX A3000 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 8200M G mGPU Intel is a notebook graphics card while RTX A3000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8200M G mGPU Intel
GeForce 8200M G mGPU Intel
NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile
RTX A3000 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 3 votes

Rate GeForce 8200M G mGPU Intel on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 125 votes

Rate RTX A3000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.