GeForce RTX 5060 3584SP Mobile vs 8200M G mGPU

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameC77GB206
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date3 June 2008 (17 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores163584
Core clock speed400 MHz2040 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2452 MHz
Number of transistors210 million21,900 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate1.600274.6
Floating-point processing power0.0256 TFLOPS17.58 TFLOPS
ROPs448
TMUs4112
Tensor Coresno data112
Ray Tracing Coresno data28
L1 Cacheno data3.5 MB
L2 Cacheno data32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR7
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data384.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.8
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 80 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 45 Watt

8200M G mGPU has 275% lower power consumption.

RTX 5060 3584SP Mobile, on the other hand, has a 1500% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8200M G mGPU AMD and GeForce RTX 5060 3584SP Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8200M G mGPU AMD
GeForce 8200M G mGPU AMD
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 3584SP Mobile
GeForce RTX 5060 3584SP Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce 8200M G mGPU AMD on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5060 3584SP Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8200M G mGPU AMD or GeForce RTX 5060 3584SP Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.