GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh vs 8200

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1253not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.70no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameC78GA107
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date17 April 2007 (17 years ago)6 July 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores162048
Core clock speed500 MHz622 MHz
Boost clock speedno data990 MHz
Number of transistors210 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology80 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate4.00063.36
Floating-point processing power0.0384 TFLOPS4.055 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs864
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIPCIe 4.0 x8
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared6 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared96 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data144.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.6
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.6

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 April 2007 6 July 2022
Chip lithography 80 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 75 Watt

GeForce 8200 has 87.5% lower power consumption.

RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 15 years, and a 900% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8200 and GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 8200 is a desktop card while GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8200
GeForce 8200
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh
GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 61 vote

Rate GeForce 8200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 38 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.