Arc Graphics 64EU vs GeForce 810M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1161not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.13no data
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Xe2-LPG (2024)
GPU code nameGF117Arrow Lake
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date24 March 2014 (12 years ago)24 October 2024 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48512
Core clock speed738 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed950 MHz1900 MHz
Number of transistors585 million17,800 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate5.90460.80
Floating-point processing power0.1417 TFLOPS1.946 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs832
L1 Cache64 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16Ring Bus
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed900 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsMotherboard Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA2.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 24 March 2014 24 October 2024
Chip lithography 28 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 65 Watt

GeForce 810M has 333% lower power consumption.

Arc Graphics 64EU, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, and a 833% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 810M and Arc Graphics 64EU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 810M is a notebook graphics card while Arc Graphics 64EU is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 547 votes

Rate GeForce 810M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 4 votes

Rate Arc Graphics 64EU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 810M or Arc Graphics 64EU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.