GeForce GTX 780 6 GB vs 810A

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking981not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency7.93no data
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameGK208GK110B
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date22 July 2014 (11 years ago)10 September 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1922304
Core clock speed719 MHz863 MHz
Boost clock speed758 MHz902 MHz
Number of transistors915 million7,080 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate12.13173.2
Floating-point processing power0.2911 TFLOPS4.156 TFLOPS
ROPs848
TMUs16192

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB6 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1502 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s288.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.1.126
CUDA3.53.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 July 2014 10 September 2013
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 6 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 250 Watt

GeForce 810A has an age advantage of 10 months, and 1566.7% lower power consumption.

GTX 780 6 GB, on the other hand, has a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 810A and GeForce GTX 780 6 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 810A is a notebook graphics card while GeForce GTX 780 6 GB is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 810A
GeForce 810A
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 6 GB
GeForce GTX 780 6 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.8 15 votes

Rate GeForce 810A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 16 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 780 6 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 810A or GeForce GTX 780 6 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.