Arc A350 vs GeForce 810A

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1005not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency8.06no data
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameGK208DG2-128
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date22 July 2014 (11 years ago)2022 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192768
Core clock speed719 MHz2000 MHz
Boost clock speed758 MHz2000 MHz
Number of transistors915 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate12.1396.00
Floating-point processing power0.2911 TFLOPS3.072 TFLOPS
ROPs824
TMUs1648
Tensor Coresno data96
Ray Tracing Coresno data6
L1 Cache32 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x8
Widthno data1-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1937 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s124.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA3.5-
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 25 Watt

GeForce 810A has 67% lower power consumption.

Arc A350, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 367% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 810A and Arc A350. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 810A is a notebook graphics card while Arc A350 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.8 15 votes

Rate GeForce 810A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 6 votes

Rate Arc A350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 810A or Arc A350, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.