Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta vs GeForce 805A

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)Fahrenheit (1998−2000)
GPU code nameGK208NV5 B5
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date22 July 2014 (11 years ago)22 March 1999 (26 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192no data
Core clock speed719 MHz100 MHz
Boost clock speed758 MHzno data
Number of transistors915 million15 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm250 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data
Texture fill rate12.130.2
Floating-point processing power0.2911 TFLOPSno data
ROPs82
TMUs162
L1 Cache32 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8AGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3SDR
Maximum RAM amount1 GB16 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1001 MHz133 MHz
Memory bandwidth16.02 GB/s1.064 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)6.0
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.61.2
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA3.5-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 July 2014 22 March 1999
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 16 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 250 nm

GeForce 805A has an age advantage of 15 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 792.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 805A and Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 805A is a notebook graphics card while Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 805A
GeForce 805A
NVIDIA Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta
Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 1 vote

Rate GeForce 805A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 13 votes

Rate Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 805A or Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.